Bad news: Fable nuked my entire dev machine
Claude decided to test a sandbox it was building by running `rm -rf` on my home directory
The sandbox didn't work.
It's all gone
Sebastien Guillemot
@SebastienGllmt
I was tired of agents consuming all the disk on the machine by dumping gigabytes of data to /tmp/
So I asked Fable to build a sandbox mechanism where agents would get part of /tmp/ that is ephemeral to avoid disk space exploding over time
So I asked Fable to build a sandbox mechanism where agents would get part of /tmp/ that is ephemeral to avoid disk space exploding over time
3:26 PM UTC · Aug 26, 2026 · 51.5K Views
16123814
Sebastien Guillemot
@SebastienGllmt
Fable told me the tricky thing if I have an agent still open in a terminal for a week, its /tmp/ could be deleted under its feet
It suggested as script to detect any agent still active, and delay their /tmp/ deletion if they're still running
Sounds reasonable
It suggested as script to detect any agent still active, and delay their /tmp/ deletion if they're still running
Sounds reasonable
3:26 PM UTC · Aug 26, 2026 · 46.5K Views
421214
Sebastien Guillemot
@SebastienGllmt
The script Fable wrote to detect if agents are still running (ugly parsing of command line arguments, etc.)
I told it the script it wrote felt over-complicated.
This is where things went wrong
Fable decided to trigger an adversarial review of its design (I didn't ask for this!)
I told it the script it wrote felt over-complicated.
This is where things went wrong
Fable decided to trigger an adversarial review of its design (I didn't ask for this!)
3:26 PM UTC · Aug 26, 2026 · 42.5K Views
621104
Sebastien Guillemot
@SebastienGllmt
The adversarial review triggered Fable's safety classifier twice: downgrading the model down to Opus 5, and then to Opus 4.8
Opus 4.8 noted: a sym link in /tmp/ could be interpreted as a delete of the underlying data (even if not in /tmp/)
you may see where this is going...
Opus 4.8 noted: a sym link in /tmp/ could be interpreted as a delete of the underlying data (even if not in /tmp/)
you may see where this is going...
3:26 PM UTC · Aug 26, 2026 · 39K Views
641348
Sebastien Guillemot
@SebastienGllmt
To fix this, Opus 4.8 decided to write a "safe" delete script that can only delete content in /tmp/ and can't delete anything else
To test this script to prove it worked, it tried to delete HOME
it didn't work
To test this script to prove it worked, it tried to delete HOME
it didn't work

3:26 PM UTC · Aug 26, 2026 · 36.7K Views
831824
Sebastien Guillemot
@SebastienGllmt
The most ironic part😅
The one thing the delete script was not able to delete is /tmp/
So my dev machine now just contains two things:
- tmp filled with the junk I wanted to delete
- the ai session logs
The one thing the delete script was not able to delete is /tmp/
So my dev machine now just contains two things:
- tmp filled with the junk I wanted to delete
- the ai session logs

3:26 PM UTC · Aug 26, 2026 · 33.7K Views
883669
Sebastien Guillemot
@SebastienGllmt
Fortunately, because this is a dev environmnet
A lot of files were on github. Of the ones that weren't, they existed in many places
- git, nix, file system, session logs, /tmp/, worktrees, etc.
This means disk recovery can piece together fragments, which codex did beautifully
A lot of files were on github. Of the ones that weren't, they existed in many places
- git, nix, file system, session logs, /tmp/, worktrees, etc.
This means disk recovery can piece together fragments, which codex did beautifully

3:26 PM UTC · Aug 26, 2026 · 32.6K Views
521667
Sebastien Guillemot
@SebastienGllmt
Rest in piece the dev environment I used for many years
But it's okay. We can rebuild it. We have the technology
better, stronger, faster
But it's okay. We can rebuild it. We have the technology
better, stronger, faster

3:26 PM UTC · Aug 26, 2026 · 30.8K Views
30136018
